pilot: need physics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.63
, episode
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.58
, passenger
Weight: 0.58
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, nurse
Weight: 0.33
, nikita
Weight: 0.33
, bus driver
Weight: 0.33
, office worker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need physics 1.00
use science 0.79
need math 0.78
need maths 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need maths)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(construction worker, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(construction worker, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need maths)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(pilot, need physics)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need maths)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(pilot, need maths)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pilot, need maths)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pilot, use science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pilot, need maths)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pilot, use science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pilot, use science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pilot, use science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need physics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pilot, need physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(construction worker, need maths)