pine: is evergreen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wood
Weight: 0.70
, conifer
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cedar
Weight: 0.38
, cypress
Weight: 0.38
, birch
Weight: 0.38
, pine tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is evergreen 1.00
is referred to as evergreens 0.78
be important to pine trees survivle 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(conifer, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pine, is evergreen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(conifer, is evergreen)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(conifer, is evergreen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(conifer, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pine, is evergreen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(pine, is evergreen)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pine, is evergreen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pine, is evergreen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(conifer, is evergreen)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(pine, is evergreen)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(conifer, is evergreen)