pine: is referred to as evergreens

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wood
Weight: 0.70
, conifer
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cedar
Weight: 0.38
, cypress
Weight: 0.38
, birch
Weight: 0.38
, pine tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is referred to as evergreens 1.00
be important to pine trees survivle 0.82
is evergreen 0.78
be classified as flowering plants 0.77
is juniper 0.77
be classified as non flowering plants 0.77
be at top of trees 0.77
be called devil pines 0.77
be like flowering plants 0.76
have used for tree ring analysis trees 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(conifer, be classified as flowering plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(conifer, be classified as non flowering plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(conifer, be like flowering plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(conifer, is evergreen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(conifer, is evergreen)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(conifer, be classified as non flowering plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(conifer, be like flowering plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(conifer, be classified as flowering plants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be classified as non flowering plants)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be classified as flowering plants)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be like flowering plants)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(conifer, is evergreen)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cedar, is juniper)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(conifer, be classified as flowering plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(conifer, be classified as non flowering plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(conifer, be like flowering plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(conifer, is evergreen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cedar, is juniper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cedar, is juniper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pine, is referred to as evergreens)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(pine, is evergreen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pine, is evergreen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pine, be called devil pines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pine, is evergreen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pine, be at top of trees)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pine, is evergreen)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pine, be called devil pines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pine, be called devil pines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pine, be called devil pines)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pine, be at top of trees)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pine, be at top of trees)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pine, be at top of trees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(conifer, is evergreen)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(conifer, be like flowering plants)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(conifer, be classified as non flowering plants)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(conifer, be classified as flowering plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cedar, is juniper)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(conifer, is evergreen)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(conifer, be like flowering plants)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(conifer, be classified as flowering plants)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(conifer, be classified as non flowering plants)