pine: have used for tree ring analysis trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wood
Weight: 0.70
, conifer
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cedar
Weight: 0.38
, cypress
Weight: 0.38
, birch
Weight: 0.38
, pine tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have used for tree ring analysis trees 1.00
be at top of trees 0.84
be important to pine trees survivle 0.83
differ from other trees 0.82
differ from many other trees 0.80
is referred to as evergreens 0.76
have rings 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(conifer, differ from other trees)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(conifer, differ from other trees)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from many other trees)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(conifer, differ from other trees)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conifer, differ from many other trees)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(conifer, differ from other trees)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pine, be at top of trees)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pine, be at top of trees)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pine, be at top of trees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pine, is referred to as evergreens)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pine, be at top of trees)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, is referred to as evergreens)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from other trees)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from other trees)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pine, have used for tree ring analysis trees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(conifer, differ from many other trees)