pipeline: improve performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.60
, natural gas
Weight: 0.58
, company
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings keystone
Weight: 0.52
, oil pipeline
Weight: 0.36
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.33
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, rail
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve performance 1.00
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pipeline, improve performance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oil pipeline, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rail, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pipeline, improve performance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rail, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(oil pipeline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(oil pipeline, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pipeline, improve performance)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pipeline, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pipeline, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pipeline, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pipeline, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pipeline, improve performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pipeline, improve performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rail, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(oil pipeline, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pipeline, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)