pit: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trap
Weight: 0.61
, excavation
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.56
, breed
Weight: 0.55
Siblings short circuit
Weight: 0.31
, dirty dancing
Weight: 0.30
, rear window
Weight: 0.30
, gladiator
Weight: 0.30
, star trek
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
has quality worse 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(trap, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pit, has quality worth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(excavation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pit, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pit, has quality worth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(excavation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pit, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(excavation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(excavation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(trap, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(excavation, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(trap, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(excavation, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dirty dancing, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(short circuit, has quality worse)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rear window, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(star trek, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(trap, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(excavation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(excavation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(dirty dancing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dirty dancing, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gladiator, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(gladiator, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(star trek, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(star trek, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(rear window, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rear window, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(gladiator, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gladiator, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(short circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(short circuit, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(short circuit, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pit, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pit, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pit, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pit, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(excavation, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(excavation, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trap, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dirty dancing, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality worse)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gladiator, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(star trek, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(gladiator, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rear window, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(excavation, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(trap, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pit, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(excavation, has quality bad)