pit: have bad name

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trap
Weight: 0.61
, excavation
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.56
, breed
Weight: 0.55
Siblings short circuit
Weight: 0.31
, dirty dancing
Weight: 0.30
, rear window
Weight: 0.30
, gladiator
Weight: 0.30
, star trek
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad name 1.00
have name 0.93
have names 0.84
have different names 0.83
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(excavation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, have bad name)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(excavation, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(excavation, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(excavation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(pit, have bad name)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(gladiator, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gladiator, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(short circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(pit, have bad name)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pit, have name)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pit, have name)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pit, have name)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pit, have name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pit, have bad name)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, have bad name)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(excavation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(gladiator, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pit, have bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(excavation, has quality bad)