pit: have name

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trap
Weight: 0.61
, excavation
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.56
, breed
Weight: 0.55
Siblings short circuit
Weight: 0.31
, dirty dancing
Weight: 0.30
, rear window
Weight: 0.30
, gladiator
Weight: 0.30
, star trek
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
have name 1.00
have bad name 0.93
have names 0.90
have different names 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pit, have name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pit, have name)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pit, have name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(pit, have bad name)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pit, have name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, have bad name)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pit, have name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(pit, have bad name)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pit, have name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pit, have bad name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pit, have name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pit, have name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pit, have name)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pit, have name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pit, have name)