pittsburgh: be good place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, team
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings newport
Weight: 0.34
, charleston
Weight: 0.34
, denver
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place live 1.00
be rated as place live 0.85
be good place retire 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be good place retire)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(charleston, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(charleston, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(charleston, be good place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(connecticut, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be good place live)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be good place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(tennessee, be good place retire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be good place retire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be good place live)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be rated as place live)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be rated as place live)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, be rated as place live)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place retire)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be good place retire)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated as place live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, be good place retire)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be good place retire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(connecticut, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(charleston, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tennessee, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(tennessee, be good place retire)