pittsburgh: be rated as place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, team
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings newport
Weight: 0.34
, charleston
Weight: 0.34
, denver
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rated as place live 1.00
be rated 0.89
be good place live 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place live)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(charleston, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(charleston, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(charleston, be good place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(connecticut, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be good place live)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be rated as place live)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be rated)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good place live)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be rated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, be rated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be good place live)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, be good place live)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be good place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated as place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be rated as place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(connecticut, be good place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(charleston, be good place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be rated as place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tennessee, be good place live)