pittsburgh: be good than boston

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, team
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings connecticut
Weight: 0.34
, michigan
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, maryland
Weight: 0.34
, columbus
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good than boston 1.00
be at utah 0.78
be at michigan 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(town, be at utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be good than boston)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be good than boston)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(town, be at michigan)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(town, be at utah)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(town, be at utah)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(town, be at utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, be good than boston)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(town, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, be good than boston)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be good than boston)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good than boston)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be good than boston)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(town, be at utah)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(town, be at michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(town, be at utah)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(pittsburgh, be good than boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(town, be at michigan)