plan b: is plan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, medication
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.62
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.34
, method
Weight: 0.32
, structure
Weight: 0.31
, assumption
Weight: 0.31
, paxil
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is plan 1.00
plan important in project management 0.87
need planning 0.78
follow strategy 0.76
be important to planning process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(project, plan important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(plan b, is plan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(plan b, is plan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(project, need planning)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(project, plan important in project management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(project, plan important in project management)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important to planning process)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(structure, follow strategy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(project, plan important in project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(plan b, is plan)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(plan b, is plan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(structure, follow strategy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(structure, follow strategy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(assumption, be important to planning process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important to planning process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(plan b, is plan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(plan b, is plan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(plan b, is plan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(project, plan important in project management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(structure, follow strategy)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(assumption, be important to planning process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(plan b, is plan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(project, plan important in project management)