:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(plan, go wrong)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, do)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(plan, go wrong)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(strategy, do)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(plan, go wrong)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, do)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(plan, go wrong)
⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(strategy, do)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(strategy, do)
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(plan, go wrong)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(plan, go wrong)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(plan, go wrong)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(plan, go wrong)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(plan, go wrong)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(architect, do)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(plan, go wrong)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(strategy, do)