plastic wrap: melt in oven

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plastic
Weight: 0.76
, material
Weight: 0.68
, packaging
Weight: 0.67
, container
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings aluminum foil
Weight: 0.37
, silicone
Weight: 0.36
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.35
, paper towel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
melt in oven 1.00
is heat insulator 0.75
is good heat insulator 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(container, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, melt in oven)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(container, melt in oven)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(container, melt in oven)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(container, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, melt in oven)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, melt in oven)

Similarity expansion

0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, melt in oven)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, melt in oven)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(container, melt in oven)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(plastic wrap, melt in oven)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(container, melt in oven)