aluminum foil: is good heat insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plastic
Weight: 0.72
, material
Weight: 0.71
, metal
Weight: 0.69
, foil
Weight: 0.59
Siblings aluminum
Weight: 0.39
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.37
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good heat insulator 1.00
be good insulator of heat 1.00
is heat insulator 0.99
is good insulator 0.96
is bad insulator 0.95
is insulator 0.94
be good insulator for ice 0.93
be good conductor of heat 0.82
absorb heat 0.79
lose quickly heat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(metal, absorb heat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(foil, be good conductor of heat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foil, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(foil, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(metal, absorb heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(metal, absorb heat)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(foil, is good insulator)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulator)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(foil, is insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, absorb heat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(foil, be good insulator of heat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foil, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(foil, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(metal, absorb heat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(foil, be good conductor of heat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is good insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(aluminum, absorb heat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(aluminum, absorb heat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, be good insulator for ice)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good insulator for ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good insulator for ice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good insulator for ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is heat insulator)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, absorb heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(aluminum foil, lose quickly heat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, absorb heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, lose quickly heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, lose quickly heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, absorb heat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, lose quickly heat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, absorb heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(foil, is insulator)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foil, is good insulator)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulator)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(metal, absorb heat)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(aluminum, absorb heat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is heat insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aluminum, is good insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(foil, is insulator)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(foil, be good insulator of heat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(foil, is good insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(aluminum foil, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(metal, absorb heat)