aluminum: be good conductor of heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.78
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
Siblings aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.66
, titanium
Weight: 0.64
, hafnium
Weight: 0.43
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.39
, steel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good conductor of heat 1.00
is good conductor 0.92
be good conductor of electricity 0.90
is conductor 0.89
absorb heat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(metal, absorb heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(metal, absorb heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(metal, absorb heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good conductor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is conductor)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, absorb heat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(metal, absorb heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(aluminum foil, absorb heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, absorb heat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good conductor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good conductor)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is conductor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is conductor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(aluminum, absorb heat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(aluminum, absorb heat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(aluminum, is good conductor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(aluminum, is conductor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is good conductor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is conductor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is good conductor)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is conductor)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(aluminum, absorb heat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aluminum, is good conductor)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(aluminum, is conductor)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, absorb heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(metal, absorb heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, absorb heat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is conductor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(metal, absorb heat)