aluminum: be good conductor of electricity

Related concepts

Parents	aluminum oxide Weight: 0.78 , heavy metal Weight: 0.72 , metal Weight: 0.67 , raw material Weight: 0.66 , chemical Weight: 0.64
Siblings	aluminum chloride Weight: 0.66 , titanium Weight: 0.64 , hafnium Weight: 0.43 , aluminum foil Weight: 0.39 , steel Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good conductor of electricity	1.00
is good conductor	0.91
be good conductor of heat	0.90
is conductor	0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is conductor)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good conductor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(aluminum foil, is conductor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is conductor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(aluminum, is good conductor)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(aluminum, is conductor)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is good conductor)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(aluminum, is good conductor)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(aluminum, is conductor)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(aluminum, is good conductor)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is conductor)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(aluminum, is conductor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is conductor)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)