play hockey: be dangerous

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.38
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.38
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous 1.00
be dangerous sport 0.89
be more dangerous than football 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sport, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(play hockey, be dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sport, be dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sport, be dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be more dangerous than football)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be dangerous sport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sport, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(play hockey, be dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ice hockey, be dangerous sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, be dangerous sport)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(hockey, be more dangerous than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hockey, be more dangerous than football)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(play hockey, be dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(play hockey, be dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sport, be dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be dangerous sport)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hockey, be more dangerous than football)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(play hockey, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sport, be dangerous)