play hockey: be motivated by be big dumb jock

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.38
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.38
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be motivated by be big dumb jock 1.00
be used to jock to feel masculine 0.84
be used to tough guy 0.80
make little kid too competitive 0.78
be used to idiot 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sport, make little kid too competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(sport, make little kid too competitive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sport, make little kid too competitive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be used to idiot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sport, make little kid too competitive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hockey, be used to idiot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(hockey, be used to idiot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be used to jock to feel masculine)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(play hockey, be used to jock to feel masculine)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(play hockey, be used to tough guy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(play hockey, be used to jock to feel masculine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(play hockey, be used to jock to feel masculine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(play hockey, be used to tough guy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be used to tough guy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(play hockey, be used to tough guy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sport, make little kid too competitive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hockey, be used to idiot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(play hockey, be motivated by be big dumb jock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sport, make little kid too competitive)