player: argue with ref

Related concepts

Parents	football player Weight: 0.75 , basketball player Weight: 0.69 , competitor Weight: 0.69 , person Weight: 0.65
Siblings	dvd player Weight: 0.82 , baseball player Weight: 0.73 , tennis player Weight: 0.69 , quarterback Weight: 0.69 , linebacker Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property	Similarity
argue with ref	1.00
argue with referee	0.93
argue with umpires	0.81
offside game	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(football player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(player, argue with ref)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(football player, argue with ref)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(football player, argue with ref)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(football player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(player, argue with ref)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(player, argue with ref)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(player, argue with referee)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(player, argue with referee)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(player, argue with referee)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(player, argue with referee)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(player, offside game)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(player, offside game)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(player, offside game)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(player, offside game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(player, argue with ref)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(player, argue with ref)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(football player, argue with ref)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(player, argue with ref) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(football player, argue with ref)