player: argue with referee

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents football player
Weight: 0.75
, basketball player
Weight: 0.69
, competitor
Weight: 0.69
, person
Weight: 0.65
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.82
, baseball player
Weight: 0.73
, tennis player
Weight: 0.69
, quarterback
Weight: 0.69
, linebacker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
argue with referee 1.00
argue with ref 0.93
argue with umpires 0.84
offside game 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(football player, argue with ref)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(player, argue with referee)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(football player, argue with ref)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(football player, argue with ref)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(football player, argue with ref)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(player, argue with referee)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(player, argue with referee)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(player, argue with ref)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(player, argue with ref)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(player, argue with ref)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(player, argue with ref)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(player, offside game)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(player, argue with referee)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(player, argue with referee)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(football player, argue with ref)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(player, argue with referee)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(football player, argue with ref)