playground: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.63
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.61
Siblings park
Weight: 0.67
, basketball court
Weight: 0.66
, tennis court
Weight: 0.65
, soccer field
Weight: 0.61
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is complicated 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(playground, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(attraction, is complicated)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(playground, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(facility, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(attraction, is complicated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(facility, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(attraction, is complicated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(playground, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(attraction, is complicated)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(playground, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amusement park, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(amusement park, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(tennis court, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tennis court, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(playground, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(playground, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(playground, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(attraction, is complicated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amusement park, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tennis court, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(playground, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(attraction, is complicated)