pocket: be a part of pair of pant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents knife
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, purse
Weight: 0.57
, size
Weight: 0.57
, firearm
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pocket knife
Weight: 0.79
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.55
, train ticket
Weight: 0.49
, briefcase
Weight: 0.33
, pant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of pair of pant 1.00
be at your pant 0.90
be wear under your trouser 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(pant, be wear under your trouser)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(pant, be wear under your trouser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pant, be wear under your trouser)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pocket, be a part of pair of pant)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pocket, be at your pant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be at your pant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(pocket, be at your pant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pocket, be at your pant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be a part of pair of pant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pocket, be a part of pair of pant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be a part of pair of pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pant, be wear under your trouser)