poker: be at any large city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.60
, board game
Weight: 0.58
, game
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings backgammon
Weight: 0.34
, hockey game
Weight: 0.33
, golf club
Weight: 0.33
, table tennis
Weight: 0.33
, roulette
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at any large city 1.00
be at city 0.83
look small than thing nearby 0.79
be more attractive when they be small 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, look small than thing nearby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poker, be at any large city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poker, be at any large city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, look small than thing nearby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(poker, be at any large city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(poker, be at any large city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(poker, be at any large city)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(poker, be at city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poker, be at city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(poker, be at city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(poker, be at city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poker, be at any large city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poker, be at any large city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(poker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)