poker: be when illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.60
, board game
Weight: 0.58
, game
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chess game
Weight: 0.35
, gambling
Weight: 0.35
, backgammon
Weight: 0.34
, blackjack
Weight: 0.34
, hockey game
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be when illegal 1.00
be illegal 0.95
is illegal 0.94
be illegal in us 0.89
be illegal in texas 0.77
be illegal in australia 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, is illegal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, is illegal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(gambling, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gambling, is illegal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(blackjack, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(blackjack, is illegal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(gambling, be illegal in us)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(gambling, be illegal in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gambling, be illegal in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(poker, be when illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(poker, be illegal)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(poker, is illegal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(poker, be illegal in us)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(poker, be illegal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(poker, be illegal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(poker, is illegal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(poker, be illegal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(poker, be illegal in us)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(poker, is illegal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(poker, be illegal in us)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(poker, be illegal in us)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(poker, is illegal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poker, be illegal in texas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(poker, be illegal in texas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poker, be illegal in texas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poker, be illegal in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(poker, be illegal in texas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(poker, be illegal in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poker, be when illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(poker, be when illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(gambling, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(blackjack, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(gambling, be illegal in us)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poker, be when illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gambling, be illegal in australia)