poland: was country have

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.63
, ally
Weight: 0.59
, soviet union
Weight: 0.59
, czech republic
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings germany
Weight: 0.37
, switzerland
Weight: 0.36
, latin america
Weight: 0.35
, britain
Weight: 0.35
, australia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was country have 1.00
is country 0.93
is world country 0.88
is good country 0.88
be considered country 0.87
is second world country 0.85
be considered bad country 0.85
is third world country 0.84
is best country 0.84
is poor country 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(britain, is country)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is best country)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(germany, is good country)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(australia, is best country)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is country)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(australia, be considered country)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is country)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(australia, is country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(australia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(australia, is country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(germany, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(germany, is country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(switzerland, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(australia, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(australia, be considered country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(britain, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(britain, is country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(germany, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(germany, is good country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(australia, is best country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(australia, is best country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(switzerland, is best country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is best country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(poland, was country have)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(poland, is country)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(poland, is country)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(poland, is good country)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered bad country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(poland, is third world country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(poland, is country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(poland, is poor country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(poland, is country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(poland, is best country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(poland, be considered country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(poland, be considered bad country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(poland, is good country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(poland, is poor country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(poland, is third world country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(poland, is best country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(poland, be considered country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poland, be considered country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(poland, be considered bad country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(poland, is good country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(poland, is poor country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(poland, is best country)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(poland, is third world country)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(poland, is good country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(poland, be considered bad country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(poland, is poor country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(poland, is best country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(poland, is third world country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poland, was country have)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(switzerland, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(germany, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(australia, is country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(australia, be considered country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(britain, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(switzerland, is best country)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(germany, is good country)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(australia, is best country)