poland: be considered country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.63
, ally
Weight: 0.59
, soviet union
Weight: 0.59
, czech republic
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings germany
Weight: 0.37
, switzerland
Weight: 0.36
, latin america
Weight: 0.35
, britain
Weight: 0.35
, australia
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered country 1.00
be considered bad country 0.94
is country 0.89
was country have 0.87
is world country 0.85
is good country 0.84
is best country 0.82
is second world country 0.81
is third world country 0.81
is developed country 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is developed country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(britain, is country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(australia, is developed country)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is best country)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(germany, is developed country)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(germany, is good country)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(australia, is best country)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(australia, be considered country)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is country)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(germany, is country)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(australia, is country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(australia, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(australia, be considered country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(australia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(australia, is country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(germany, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(germany, is country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(switzerland, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(britain, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(britain, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(germany, is good country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(germany, is good country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(australia, is best country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(australia, is best country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(switzerland, is best country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is best country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(germany, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(germany, is developed country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(switzerland, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is developed country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(australia, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(australia, is developed country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(poland, be considered country)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered bad country)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(poland, is country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(poland, be considered bad country)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(poland, is country)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(poland, is country)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(poland, is country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poland, was country have)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(poland, is good country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(poland, is third world country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(poland, is best country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poland, is developed country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(poland, was country have)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poland, was country have)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(poland, was country have)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(poland, is developed country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(poland, is good country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(poland, is best country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(poland, be considered bad country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(poland, is third world country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poland, is developed country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(poland, is good country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(poland, is developed country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(poland, be considered bad country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(poland, is best country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(poland, is third world country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(poland, is good country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(poland, is best country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(poland, is third world country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poland, be considered country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(switzerland, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(germany, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(australia, is country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(australia, be considered country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(switzerland, is developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(germany, is developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(britain, is country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(switzerland, is best country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(australia, is developed country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(germany, is good country)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(poland, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(australia, is best country)