polar bear: has physical part skin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bear
Weight: 0.79
, brown bear
Weight: 0.75
, mammal
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic
Weight: 0.72
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.74
, black bear
Weight: 0.41
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38
, moose
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part skin 1.00
has physical part hair 0.90
has physical part teeth 0.86
has physical part nails 0.85
has physical part legs 0.85
has physical part nose 0.85
has physical part eyes 0.84
has physical part fat 0.84
has physical part muscles 0.84
has physical part whiskers 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(polar bear, has physical part skin)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(polar bear, has physical part skin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(moose, has physical part legs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(polar bear, has physical part skin)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bear, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(polar bear, has physical part skin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(moose, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(moose, has physical part legs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(polar bear, has physical part skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(polar bear, has physical part skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(moose, has physical part legs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(polar bear, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part eyes)