pole: be in darkness

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.57
, car
Weight: 0.57
Siblings north pole
Weight: 0.63
, lap
Weight: 0.32
, police car
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in darkness 1.00
have 24 hours of darkness 0.95
be in darkness during winter 0.93
have 6 months of darkness 0.90
has state dark 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(north pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(north pole, has state dark)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(north pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(north pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(north pole, has state dark)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(north pole, has state dark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(pole, be in darkness)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pole, have 6 months of darkness)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pole, has state dark)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pole, have 6 months of darkness)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pole, has state dark)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(pole, be in darkness during winter)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pole, have 6 months of darkness)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pole, has state dark)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(pole, has state dark)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pole, have 6 months of darkness)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in darkness)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pole, be in darkness)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(north pole, have 24 hours of darkness)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in darkness)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(north pole, has state dark)