pole: have different seasons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.57
, car
Weight: 0.57
Siblings north pole
Weight: 0.63
, lap
Weight: 0.32
, police car
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have different seasons 1.00
have seasons 0.97
be different 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(north pole, have seasons)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(north pole, have different seasons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(north pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(north pole, have different seasons)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(north pole, have seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(north pole, have seasons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pole, have different seasons)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pole, be different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pole, be different)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pole, be different)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pole, be different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pole, have different seasons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pole, have different seasons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(north pole, have different seasons)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pole, have different seasons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(north pole, have seasons)