policeman: be at crime scene

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.79
, police
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.64
, witness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.39
, postman
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at crime scene 1.00
be at scene of crime 1.00
stop crime 0.86
wants to prevent crime 0.81
notice crime 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(witness, notice crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(policeman, be at crime scene)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(witness, notice crime)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(witness, notice crime)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(witness, notice crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(policeman, be at crime scene)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(policeman, be at crime scene)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(policeman, be at scene of crime)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(policeman, notice crime)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(policeman, be at scene of crime)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(policeman, be at scene of crime)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(policeman, stop crime)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(policeman, wants to prevent crime)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(policeman, stop crime)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(policeman, wants to prevent crime)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(policeman, stop crime)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(policeman, stop crime)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wants to prevent crime)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(policeman, notice crime)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(policeman, notice crime)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policeman, notice crime)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(policeman, wants to prevent crime)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(policeman, be at crime scene)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(witness, notice crime)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(witness, notice crime)