policeman: put in vests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.79
, police
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.64
, witness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38
, young man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
put in vests 1.00
wear helmets 0.79
wear uniforms 0.78
wear hats 0.77
wear different hats 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(police, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(policeman, put in vests)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(police, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(police, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear uniforms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(police, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(policeman, put in vests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(police officer, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear hats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(policeman, put in vests)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(policeman, wear uniforms)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(policeman, wear different hats)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(policeman, wear helmets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(policeman, wear different hats)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(policeman, wear hats)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear different hats)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear uniforms)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(policeman, wear hats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(policeman, wear uniforms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(policeman, wear helmets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear hats)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear hats)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear different hats)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear helmets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear helmets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear uniforms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(policeman, put in vests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(police, wear uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(policeman, put in vests)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(police, wear uniforms)