policy: be needed in organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, strategy
Weight: 0.63
, recommendation
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.60
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.67
, bill
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, report
Weight: 0.65
, prohibition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed in organization 1.00
is needed 0.83
be important in community services 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(policy, be needed in organization)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(duty, be important in community services)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(policy, be needed in organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(duty, be important in community services)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(duty, be important in community services)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(report, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(duty, be important in community services)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(report, is needed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(report, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(policy, be needed in organization)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(policy, is needed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, is needed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(policy, is needed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(policy, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(policy, be needed in organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(duty, be important in community services)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(report, is needed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(duty, be important in community services)