strategy: is needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is needed 1.00
is necessary 0.86
be needed in organization 0.83
is required 0.82
create needs 0.80
be necessary in system 0.79
need time specific 0.77
have more time going 0.76
is used more 0.75
have time going 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(policy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(plan, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(method, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(objective, need time specific)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(plan, have more time going)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(plan, have time going)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(policy, is needed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(policy, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(method, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(plan, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(plan, have time going)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plan, have more time going)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(objective, need time specific)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(objective, need time specific)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(plan, have more time going)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(plan, is necessary)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(method, is necessary)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, is needed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(plan, have time going)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(approach, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(marketing, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marketing, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(framework, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(planning, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(planning, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(planning, is required)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(marketing, create needs)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(planning, be necessary in system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(policy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(plan, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(method, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(objective, need time specific)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(plan, have more time going)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(method, is used more)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(plan, have time going)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(planning, is needed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(planning, is needed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(marketing, is needed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(marketing, is needed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(approach, is needed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(approach, is needed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(planning, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(planning, is necessary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(framework, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(framework, is necessary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(consolidation, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(consolidation, is necessary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(marketing, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(marketing, is necessary)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(planning, is required)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(planning, is required)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(marketing, create needs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(marketing, create needs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(planning, be necessary in system)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(planning, be necessary in system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(strategy, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(policy, is needed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(policy, is necessary)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(method, is necessary)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(plan, is necessary)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(plan, have time going)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(policy, be needed in organization)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plan, have more time going)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(objective, need time specific)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(planning, is needed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(marketing, is needed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(planning, is necessary)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(planning, is required)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(framework, is necessary)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(approach, is needed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(planning, be necessary in system)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(marketing, create needs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(consolidation, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(marketing, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(policy, is needed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(policy, is necessary)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(method, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(plan, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(plan, have time going)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(policy, be needed in organization)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plan, have more time going)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(strategy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(objective, need time specific)