policy: is implemented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, strategy
Weight: 0.63
, recommendation
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.60
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.67
, bill
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, report
Weight: 0.65
, prohibition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is implemented 1.00
be enacted 0.80
is introduced 0.76
is formulated 0.76
is developed 0.76
was introduced 0.75
was introduced in 1919 0.75
was introduced in 1920s 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bill, is introduced)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(bill, is introduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bill, is introduced)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was introduced)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(policy, is implemented)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(policy, be enacted)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(policy, is formulated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(policy, is developed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(policy, is formulated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(policy, is formulated)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(policy, be enacted)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(policy, is developed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(policy, be enacted)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(policy, be enacted)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(policy, is formulated)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(policy, is developed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(policy, is developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, is implemented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, is implemented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(bill, is introduced)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)