politics: have negative connotation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sphere
Weight: 0.69
, matter
Weight: 0.65
, realm
Weight: 0.65
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings culture
Weight: 0.35
, dark matter
Weight: 0.34
, rhetoric
Weight: 0.34
, grey matter
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have negative connotation 1.00
bear negative connotation 0.95
is negative 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, have negative connotation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, have negative connotation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(politics, have negative connotation)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(politics, bear negative connotation)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(politics, bear negative connotation)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(politics, bear negative connotation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(politics, is negative)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(politics, bear negative connotation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(politics, is negative)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(politics, is negative)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(politics, is negative)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(politics, have negative connotation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(politics, have negative connotation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(rhetoric, have negative connotation)