rhetoric: have negative connotation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, art
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings politics
Weight: 0.34
, hyperbole
Weight: 0.33
, ideology
Weight: 0.33
, agenda
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have negative connotation 1.00
have connotation 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(politics, have negative connotation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(politics, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(politics, have negative connotation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(rhetoric, have negative connotation)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(rhetoric, have connotation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, have connotation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, have connotation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(rhetoric, have connotation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, have negative connotation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(rhetoric, have negative connotation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, have negative connotation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(politics, have negative connotation)