polynomial: were replaced with system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents simple function
Weight: 0.63
, function
Weight: 0.58
, sequence
Weight: 0.54
, expression
Weight: 0.53
, topic
Weight: 0.53
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.36
, configuration
Weight: 0.32
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.32
, recursion
Weight: 0.32
, stop codon
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were replaced with system 1.00
were replaced with system of nomenclature 0.87
were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature 0.80
is are removed 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(topic, is are removed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(topic, is are removed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(topic, is are removed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(topic, is are removed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system of nomenclature)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system of nomenclature)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system of nomenclature)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system of nomenclature)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system of binomial nomenclature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(topic, is are removed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(polynomial, were replaced with system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(topic, is are removed)