pond: be at meadow

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.65
, fresh water
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.62
Siblings creek
Weight: 0.36
, river
Weight: 0.36
, marsh
Weight: 0.35
, sea water
Weight: 0.35
, salt water
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at meadow 1.00
be at flat grassland 0.78
be at pond 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(shallow water, be at pond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pond, be at meadow)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be at pond)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be at pond)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(creek, be at meadow)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(shallow water, be at pond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pond, be at meadow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(creek, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creek, be at meadow)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(marsh, be at flat grassland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at flat grassland)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pond, be at meadow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at meadow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(pond, be at meadow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at pond)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(creek, be at meadow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(marsh, be at flat grassland)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(pond, be at meadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at pond)