poor people: be in india

Related concepts

Parents	many people Weight: 0.75 , most people Weight: 0.66 , other people Weight: 0.62 , group Weight: 0.60 , lack Weight: 0.60
Siblings	redneck Weight: 0.44 , young people Weight: 0.40 , business people Weight: 0.38 , older people Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in india	1.00
be treated in india	0.92
go in malaysia	0.81
be in brazil	0.78
live in mexico city	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(most people, be in brazil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(poor people, be in india)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(many people, live in mexico city) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(poor people, be in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(most people, be in brazil)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(many people, live in mexico city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(many people, live in mexico city)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(most people, be in brazil)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(most people, be in brazil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(poor people, be in india)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(many people, live in mexico city) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(poor people, be in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(poor people, be in india)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(poor people, be in brazil)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(poor people, be in brazil)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(poor people, live in mexico city)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(poor people, be in brazil)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(poor people, be in brazil)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(poor people, live in mexico city)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(poor people, live in mexico city)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(poor people, be treated in india)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(poor people, be treated in india)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(poor people, be treated in india)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(poor people, be treated in india)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(poor people, live in mexico city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(poor people, be in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(poor people, be in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(most people, be in brazil)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(many people, live in mexico city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(most people, be in brazil)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(poor people, be in india) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(many people, live in mexico city)