poor people: be treated in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents many people
Weight: 0.75
, most people
Weight: 0.66
, other people
Weight: 0.62
, group
Weight: 0.60
, lack
Weight: 0.60
Siblings redneck
Weight: 0.44
, young people
Weight: 0.40
, business people
Weight: 0.38
, older people
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated in india 1.00
be in india 0.92
be treated in buddhism 0.84
were treated in 1800s 0.78
were treated 0.78
were treated like 0.77
is treated badly 0.76
were treated in time 0.75
go in malaysia 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(poor people, be treated in india)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(poor people, be in india)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(poor people, be in india)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be in india)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(poor people, be in india)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be treated in buddhism)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(poor people, were treated in 1800s)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(poor people, were treated in 1800s)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(poor people, were treated in 1800s)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(poor people, be treated in buddhism)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poor people, is treated badly)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poor people, be treated in buddhism)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(poor people, were treated in 1800s)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(poor people, be treated in buddhism)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poor people, is treated badly)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(poor people, were treated like)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(poor people, were treated like)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(poor people, were treated like)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(poor people, were treated like)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(poor people, is treated badly)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(poor people, is treated badly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be treated in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(poor people, be treated in india)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(poor people, be treated in india)