pop music: be have income

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents music
Weight: 0.71
, rock music
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.62
, media
Weight: 0.61
Siblings classical music
Weight: 0.74
, country music
Weight: 0.70
, rap music
Weight: 0.59
, rock n roll
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be have income 1.00
be have better income 0.96
be have income in countries 0.93
be have income in other countries 0.91
be have better income in countries 0.91
be have better income in other countries 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(pop music, be have income)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pop music, be have better income)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have better income)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pop music, be have income in countries)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(pop music, be have better income in countries)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have better income in countries)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(pop music, be have better income in countries)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(pop music, be have better income)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pop music, be have income in other countries)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have income in other countries)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have income in countries)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(pop music, be have better income in other countries)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have better income in other countries)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(pop music, be have better income in other countries)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pop music, be have income in countries)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(pop music, be have income in other countries)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pop music, be have better income in countries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pop music, be have better income in other countries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pop music, be have income in countries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pop music, be have income in other countries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(pop music, be have better income)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pop music, be have income)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pop music, be have income)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pop music, be have income)