pop: be expensive in australia

Related concepts

Parents	hit Weight: 0.60 , sound Weight: 0.58 , artist Weight: 0.56 , singer Weight: 0.56
Siblings	music Weight: 0.64 , hound dog Weight: 0.56 , punk rock Weight: 0.34 , musician Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be expensive in australia	1.00
be popular in india	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(pop, be expensive in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(pop, be expensive in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(pop, be expensive in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(pop, be popular in india)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(pop, be expensive in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(pop, be popular in india)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(pop, be expensive in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(pop, be popular in india)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.35

Salient(pop, be expensive in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(pop, be popular in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Salient(pop, be expensive in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(pop, be expensive in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(pop, be expensive in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(pop, be expensive in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(pop, be expensive in australia)