pop: be popular in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.60
, sound
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.56
, singer
Weight: 0.56
Siblings music
Weight: 0.64
, hound dog
Weight: 0.56
, punk rock
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in india 1.00
be expensive in australia 0.81
is popular 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(music, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(music, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(music, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pop, be popular in india)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(pop, be expensive in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pop, be expensive in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pop, be expensive in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pop, be expensive in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pop, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pop, is popular)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pop, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pop, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pop, be popular in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pop, be popular in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pop, be popular in india) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(music, is popular)