:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pop, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(music, is popular)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(pop, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pop, is popular)
Similarity expansion
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pop, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pop, is famous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pop, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop, is famous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(pop, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop, is famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pop, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pop, is famous)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(pop, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pop, is popular)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pop, is popular)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(music, is popular)