popcorn: be low in calorie

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, beverage
Weight: 0.56
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.36
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.36
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, soda
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be low in calorie 1.00
be low in calories 0.91
be high in calories 0.89
have calories 0.86
is calories 0.86
have many calories 0.86
have more calories 0.85
is more calories 0.85
have less calories 0.84
is less calories 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(beverage, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(popcorn, be low in calorie)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(beverage, be high in calories)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be high in calories)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, be low in calories)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, be high in calories)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have calories)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(beverage, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(popcorn, be low in calorie)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(pretzel, be low in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(pretzel, be low in calories)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pretzel, be high in calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pretzel, be high in calories)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot chocolate, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, have calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(popcorn, be low in calorie)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(popcorn, have more calories)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(popcorn, have more calories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(popcorn, be low in calorie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beverage, be high in calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have calories)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pretzel, be high in calories)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pretzel, be low in calories)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(popcorn, be low in calorie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beverage, be high in calories)