popcorn: have more calories unpopped

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, beverage
Weight: 0.56
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.36
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.36
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, soda
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more calories unpopped 1.00
be unpopped more calories 1.00
have calories unpopped 0.99
be unpopped calories 0.99
have more calories 0.95
have less calories 0.94
is more calories 0.94
have calories 0.94
is less calories 0.94
have many calories 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot chocolate, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, have calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(popcorn, have more calories unpopped)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, be unpopped more calories)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(popcorn, be unpopped more calories)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(popcorn, be unpopped more calories)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(popcorn, be unpopped more calories)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(popcorn, have more calories)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(popcorn, have more calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories unpopped)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(popcorn, have more calories unpopped)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories unpopped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have calories)