popcorn: lose calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, beverage
Weight: 0.56
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.36
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.36
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, soda
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
lose calories 1.00
have calories 0.95
have more calories 0.95
is calories 0.95
is more calories 0.95
have less calories 0.94
is less calories 0.94
have many calories 0.93
be high in calories 0.93
be low in calories 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(beverage, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(popcorn, lose calories)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(beverage, be high in calories)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be high in calories)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, be low in calories)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pretzel, be high in calories)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have calories)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(beverage, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(popcorn, lose calories)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot chocolate, have calories)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, have calories)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pretzel, be high in calories)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pretzel, be high in calories)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(pretzel, be low in calories)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(pretzel, be low in calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(popcorn, lose calories)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(popcorn, have more calories)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, have more calories)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(popcorn, have more calories)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(popcorn, have more calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(popcorn, lose calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beverage, be high in calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have calories)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pretzel, be high in calories)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pretzel, be low in calories)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(popcorn, lose calories)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beverage, be high in calories)