population: be related to pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents force
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, state
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings first nations
Weight: 0.63
, homeless person
Weight: 0.61
, age
Weight: 0.60
, homeless
Weight: 0.57
, minority
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to pollution 1.00
be related to environment 0.78
be related 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(force, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(population, be related to pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(force, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(force, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(force, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(population, be related to pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(population, be related to pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(population, be related to environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(population, be related to environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(population, be related to environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(population, be related)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(population, be related)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(population, be related to pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(population, be related to pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(force, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(population, be related to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(force, be related)