population: be related to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents force
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, state
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings first nations
Weight: 0.63
, homeless person
Weight: 0.61
, age
Weight: 0.60
, homeless
Weight: 0.57
, minority
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to environment 1.00
affect environment 0.90
be related 0.84
be related in ecosystem 0.82
be related to community 0.80
be related to pollution 0.78
be threat to environment 0.78
become adapted to environment 0.78
affect natural resources of particular society 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(force, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(population, be related to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(force, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(force, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(force, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(population, be related to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(population, be related to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(population, affect environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(population, affect environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(population, be related)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(population, affect environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(population, affect environment)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(population, be related to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(population, be related to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(force, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(population, be related to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(force, be related)